<\/p>\n
Vabimo vas na forum \u201cNenasilje pomeni razumevanje nasilja in spremembo \u2013 Predava: mag. Markus Van Alphen, <\/b>strokovnjak za restorativne metode, terapevt klini\u010dne psihologije in mojster komunikacije z Univerze v Leidenu na Nizozemskem<\/p>\n a<\/span><\/p>\n \u00bbPreden lahko koristno razpravljamo o nenasilju, moramo najprej razumeti, kaj je nasilje. Bodisi kot je Durkheim povedal v letih 18.stol., brez kriminala ne bi bilo dru\u017ebe- meje morajo biti vidne, preden obstajajo. Tako bo prvi del zasedanja namenjen razumevanju nasilja. Odkod prihaja? Zakaj je koristno ( \u010de ne bi bilo, enostavno ne bi obstajalo)? Kako ljudje obravnavajo gro\u017enje? Kaj je mo\u010d in kak\u0161na je razlika med samoobrambo in nasiljem? Po kratkem uvodu bo odprta razprava o temi.<\/p>\n Drugi del predavanja je namenjen vpra\u0161anju sprememb. Ob predpostavki povzetka prvega dela, da \u017eelimo nenasilno dru\u017ebo, je vpra\u0161anje, kako dose\u010di spremembo. \u010ce bi bila sprememba tako enostavna, bi se \u017ee dolgo pred tem lahko odlo\u010dili, da je nasilje nesprejemljivo in dru\u017ebo ustrezno spremenili. O\u010ditno nismo bodisi ugotovili, da je nasilje sprejemjljivo ali resno sprejeli, kako mo\u010dan je status quo. Gandhi je rekel, da bo za spremembo, ki jo \u017eelite na svetu videti, morda najprej potrebno pogledati, zakaj je ljudem tako te\u017eko spremeniti stvari v \u017eivljenju. Po kratkem uvodu sledi razprava.<\/p>\n Upamo, da v zaklju\u010dku pridemo do seznama konkretnih ukrepov, ki ga pripravi vsak individualno, da lahko slu\u017eijo kolektivnemu idealu nenasilne ( oziroma vsaj manj nasilne) dru\u017ebe.<\/p>\n A<\/span><\/p>\n A<\/span><\/p>\n Before you can usefully discuss non-violence, you will first need to understand what violence is. Or as Durkheim put it in the 1800\u2019s, without crime there wouldn\u2019t be a society \u2013 the boundaries need to be visible before they can exist. So the first part of the session will be devoted to understanding violence. Where does it come from? Why is it useful (if it wasn\u2019t useful, it simply wouldn\u2019t be there)? How do people deal with threats? What is power and what is the difference between defending yourself and violence? After a short introduction the floor will be opened for deeper discussion on the subject.<\/p>\n The second part of the session is devoted to the question of change. Assuming the result of the first part is that we want a non-violent society, the question is how to bring about change. If change were that easy, we would long ago have decided that violence is unacceptable and changed society accordingly. Apparently we either find violence acceptable, or haven\u2019t taken seriously how powerful the status quo is. Ghandi said to be the change you want to see in the world, so perhaps it\u2019s time to first look at why people find it so hard to change things in their own lives. Again a short introduction, followed by discussion.<\/p>\n It is hoped that in the conclusion we can come to a list of concrete actions that each of us individually is prepared to do that may serve the collective ideal of a non-violent (or at least a less violent) society.\u00ab<\/p>\n
\nNon-violence means understanding violence and change\u201d, <\/strong>ki bo potekal v \u010detrtek, 23.10.2014 <\/strong>ob <\/b>16. uri<\/strong> v <\/b>prostorih Teozofske knji\u017enice Alme M. Karlin v Celju.<\/strong><\/p>\n